An Argument For Guns

Guns stop beheadings










Last week an Islamist terrorist beheaded a woman at a food products factory in Oklahoma. He attempted to behead a second woman but was stopped when he was shot by the owner of the factory.

The liberal media and authorities are falling over themselves to portray the incident as a case of “workplace violence”. Given that the murderer was a recent convert to Islam and chose the ISIS terrorist group’s method of choice for the execution, that is a hugely implausible attempt at political correctness. Absolute nonsense, but that is a separate debate.

It’s just one more example of how guns in the hands of good guys save lives.

On another continent, guns saved my parents’ lives in a terrorist ambush. The knowledge that I had guns and would use them prevented our farm-house being overrun and my wife and I being severely assaulted or murdered in the Zimbabwe farm invasions.

If that beheading incident had taken place in Canada, the second victim would have had no chance. Gun laws here would have prevented the owner carrying a weapon or having one close to hand in a workplace.

In the unlikely event that the owner did manage to get his gun out of a locked gun safe, remove the trigger lock, get ammunition from a separate secure place and load the magazine in time to shoot the murderer, he would almost certainly have been charged with a number of firearm offences.

The West’s tolerance of demands for special treatment by immigrant minorities and tolerance of their disregard for local customs and laws is going to have serious consequences. I hope I am wrong, but I fear more incidents like the Oklahoma beheading.

Canada’s gun laws have left law-abiding citizens emasculated, unable to defend themselves and exposed to persecution by big government should they attempt to exert the most basic human rights of all. The right to life and to protect one’s family.


One comment

  1. Tim says:

    Peter another challenging thus thought provoking blog. I wonder if this whole issue comes down to the word ‘freedom’. If a person knew that killing another human was severely punishable with a sentence of hard labor with no parole, I believe that there would be thoughts changed, because they would understand that their freedom in life would be limited. To carry this a bit deeper, I believe that the word freedom is misunderstood. I say that because humans now think that because they have freedom they can impose their attitudes and their violence on anyone without repercussion. If the way we think of freedom changes, even the violent will think differently before they take any action.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. .